Age of Empires II This is fine.

This is fine.
Another AOEII LAN day. These sneaky mofo's snuck my empty computer case out of my house, built me a PC, and surprised me with it today. No more laptop AOE for me! Love these guys
My brother’s submission to a local Lego event. “Sicilian Donjon”
New Spanish Campaign: The Escape of Hernan Cortes
Thanks to the Community
What are all the civs that have bonuses towards pike/siege? (for arabia)
Everything wrong with Bohemians
So is Runestones basically "Old Arabia"?
what do you guys think if the random Maps/Skirmish gamemode had heros?
Scout rush composition
Most OP berry bush ive ever seen in a mega random generation
Obuch va konnik
Cicero build order scenario: what am I doing wrong? There are two wood metrics
What balance changes and new civs would you like to see in our game? Here's my 2 cents on the matter, looking forward to hear about yours!
Is last DLC worth it ?
Queue dodging isn't an issue... The bad matchmaking code is !
Noob question: control castle attack
hi, as poland you can give light cav in imperial a bonus with aoe damage, does this count for wing hussars as well? thanks!
I really hate resource control maps.
What are arbalest with hussar spam civs?
Online Community Appreciation Post
Mountain Nobles (next DLC Pitch - I'm only half-joking).
Jan Zizka 4 (Hard)

Posted: 29 Aug 2021 02:55 AM PDT

submitted by /u/wizwag_
[link] [comments]

Another AOEII LAN day. These sneaky mofo's snuck my empty computer case out of my house, built me a PC, and surprised me with it today. No more laptop AOE for me! Love these guys

Posted: 28 Aug 2021 10:30 AM PDT

submitted by /u/StayAWhile-AndListen
[link] [comments]

My brother’s submission to a local Lego event. “Sicilian Donjon”

Posted: 28 Aug 2021 01:49 PM PDT

submitted by /u/robhilife
[link] [comments]

New Spanish Campaign: The Escape of Hernan Cortes

Posted: 28 Aug 2021 10:57 PM PDT

Hey guys, brand new custom scenario by the designer of The Hautevilles, Ivaylo, and other official campaigns!

The Escape of Hernan Cortes (or available in the in-game mod manager)

Montezuma is dead and the city of Tenochtitlan has risen against you. As Hernan Cortes, lead your conquistadors out of the massive and hostile capital during La Noche Triste. When you win, choose a different conquistador to be your lieutenant and see if you can escape with more gold and fewer losses! An HD Classic reimagined for the Definitive Edition with all new gameplay!

Features:

Play the events of Montezuma 4 from the Spanish perspective.
How well you do determines Cortes' place in history. Play multiple times to see if you can surpass Cortes himself!
Infinite replayability -- 12 different endings and choice of 4 conquistadors to define your army's strengths!
HD custom campaign classic completely reimagined for the Definitive Edition.
Fully voiced campaign.

The Escape of Hernan Cortes

submitted by /u/FilthydelphiaAoK
[link] [comments]

Thanks to the Community

Posted: 29 Aug 2021 03:52 AM PDT

Over the past couple of months I've come here many times for advice on the game. After crashing down to under 500 Elo, I'm now very close to breaking 800.

All the advice from tips, builds, and videos to watch has actually made the game competitive and enjoyable for me again.

Thank you all, and looking forward to seeing some of you when I break +1000 💪

submitted by /u/blameyourtruth
[link] [comments]

What are all the civs that have bonuses towards pike/siege? (for arabia)

Posted: 29 Aug 2021 06:37 AM PDT

I try to pick a strategy i want to try, and then i pick the civ that ill play from there, of course many times this is an epic fail, but i like trying different things, and at 1200 elo, we hardly ever see pike siege combos, so its something i regularly try. Im assuming there's a fair number of civs who's eco/military gives them some help. Im guessing the top contenders are:

-Slavs

-Celts

-Bulgarians

-Aztecs

-Teutons

-Vikings

-Koreans (but only late game)

-Burma (wood + good pikes)

-Ethiopians (free pike + UT, eco helps a little)

And some civs that contribute towards going pike siege even if it isnt as big:

-Japanese (small eco towards it + good pikes)

-Bohemians (better pikes + chemistry for scorps)

-Goths(cheap pikes but no SE or eco for siege)

Im leaving out civs like malians (no siege engineers, bad late game pikes), porto (no squires + no eco until you actually start making siege, so a big lag on an already slow strategy)

Anyone else? Or are my constraints too stringent?

submitted by /u/peeking_duck4
[link] [comments]

Everything wrong with Bohemians

Posted: 28 Aug 2021 07:42 AM PDT

submitted by /u/NativeEuropeas
[link] [comments]

So is Runestones basically "Old Arabia"?

Posted: 28 Aug 2021 03:47 PM PDT

submitted by /u/OLTARZEWSKT1
[link] [comments]

what do you guys think if the random Maps/Skirmish gamemode had heros?

Posted: 29 Aug 2021 07:40 AM PDT

sorry if this discussion has bought up before, one of my favorite thing about AOM was heros. what do you guys think if every civ had one hero for each age up, like each age up you get one hero.. who provide either support or really good unite likable to tank 3 to 5 knight. I mean imagination is the only limit here.. you can have insane OP stuff if the dev is not careful.. but I feel like it would be a nice addition, but I'm sure veterans of this game will tell me why its a bad idea.. so yea just wanted to spark a discussion

what is the biggest pro/con you guys see in this?

submitted by /u/Virtual_Pilot_999
[link] [comments]

Scout rush composition

Posted: 29 Aug 2021 03:53 AM PDT

If you guys do a scout rush, how many scouts you using?. Do you go bloodlines, forging and plate boarding armor as upgrades? If so in what order? Or do you wait for full upgrades?

I play Sicilians 20 pop and go for 5 scouts, forging and bloodlines personally. Not sure if ideal so curious how on your thoughts on Sicilians or any other civ.

submitted by /u/Batigoal87
[link] [comments]

Most OP berry bush ive ever seen in a mega random generation

Posted: 28 Aug 2021 11:41 AM PDT

submitted by /u/picklejar_at_steves
[link] [comments]

Obuch va konnik

Posted: 28 Aug 2021 05:05 PM PDT

Does the resurrected konnik inherits the armor penalties from when he was on a horse? Or do the penalties reset?

submitted by /u/Orcdolphin
[link] [comments]

Cicero build order scenario: what am I doing wrong? There are two wood metrics

Posted: 28 Aug 2021 08:10 PM PDT

submitted by /u/Caffeinated_Thesis
[link] [comments]

What balance changes and new civs would you like to see in our game? Here's my 2 cents on the matter, looking forward to hear about yours!

Posted: 28 Aug 2021 11:12 AM PDT

Hi guys and girls! This is going to be a long, long post, and its my first one here, so sorry about that in advance. If you find it thought provoking or in any way helpful, I'd love to hear your opinion. Hope you enjoy it! :)

GENERAL CHANGES

ARCHITECTURE

Persians: change their architecture set from Middle Eastern ▶ Central Asian*.
Introduce a new Eurasian steppe architecture, based on the nomadic or semi nomadic origin of the Cumans, Huns and Mongols** (Yurts are already in the game and look great, the rest of the set could be inspired by their style, making cities look more like temporary encampments, especially for the Huns).

^\ Is it just me, or the Central Asian architecture set) ^IS ^{inspired by persian buildings? Well, make it coherent then. Just my opinion :} (also, cuman and tatar architecture, everytime I play them, give me a AoE 1 vive, feels like the old persian architecture.)

^\* Maybe Magyars could get this set until they research Apostolic Kingdom, adding even more flavor to the civ (see below).)

UNITS

Knight line: include reskins for non european knights, but without much effort... they are already in the game!:

African civs: Sundjata hero unit.

^Ethiopians

Eastern asian civs: Le Lai hero unit.

^{Chinese ● Koreans ● Japanese ● Vietnamese}

Southern asian civs: Envoy hero unit.

^{Burmese ● Khmer ● Rajputs (}^{current Indians} ● Tamils)

Also, Cavaliers and Paladins shouldn't be a generic unit, capable of being available to any civ, but rather a regional unit for the christian nations of Europe and Western Asia. Still, Knights are too much of an iconic unit for our game and our meta, so I thought we should only remove them from those civs which gain a new unit, not necessarily replacing it, but more like "compensating" such civs for the loss of knights. This change would look like this:

Knight civs

^{Burmese ● Chinese ● Ethiopians ● Khmer ● Koreans ● Japanese ● Malay ● Rajputs (}^{current Indians} ● Vietnamese)

Cavalier civs

^{Bohemians ● Britons ● Bulgarians ● Celts ● Goths ● Italians ● Poles ● Portuguese ● Sicilians ● Slavs ● Vikings\})

^(\ I know, Vikings were not christians, at least not in their famous pillaging and raiding days. I chose to leave it as is because, despite having the Jarl model in the scenario editor, the vikings already get 2 unique units, and renaming knights to Jarls would technically give them a third. Also, reskinning a unit for a single civ creates too much confusion and gameplay is more important than absolute historicity, i believe (our game is already complex as is, especially to newcomers).)*

Paladin civs

^{Burgundians ● Byzantines ● Franks ● Lithuanians ● Magyars ● Spanish ● Teutons}

NEW REGIONAL UNITS

Mounted archer line: Cheaper and faster but less attack and range versions of Cavalry Archers for the Eurasian Steppe civs (Cumans, Huns, Magyars, Mongols and Tatars), available from the Feudal Age onwards. These civs lose access to the Knight line.

Mounted archer (Feudal Age) ▶ Horse Archer (Castle Age) ▶ Elite Horse Archer (Imperial Age)

Mounted Archer

^Cost^{: 70F, 30G |} ^{Training time}^{: 30 seconds |} ^Attack^{: 3 |} ^{Rate of fire}^{: 1.9 |} ^{Frame delay}^{: 25 |} ^A^{ttack delay}^{: 0.65 |} ^Range^{: 3 |} ^Accuracy^{: 60% |} ^{Projectile speed}^{: 7 |} ^{Hit points}^{: 35 |} ^Armor^{: 0/0 |} ^Speed^{: 1.45 |} ^{Line of sight}^{: 6 |} ^{Attack bonuses}^{: +2 vs Spearman |} ^{Already in-game model}^{: Subotai hero unit.}

Horse Archer

^Cost^{: 70F, 30G |} ^{Training time}^{: 30 seconds |} ^Attack^{: 4 |} ^{Rate of fire}^{: 1.8 |} ^{Frame delay}^{: 22 |} ^A^{ttack delay}^{: 0.6 |} ^Range^{: 4 |} ^Accuracy^{: 70% |} ^{Projectile speed}^{: 7 |} ^{Hit points}^{: 40 |} ^Armor^{: 0/0 |} ^Speed^{: 1.45 |} ^{Line of sight}^{: 7 |} ^{Attack bonuses}^{: +2 vs Spearman |} ^{Already in-game model}^{: Girgen Khan hero unit.}

Elite Horse Archer

^Cost^{: 70F, 30G |} ^{Training time}^{: 30 seconds |} ^Attack^{: 5 |} ^{Rate of fire}^{: 1.75 |} ^{Frame delay}^{: 20 |} ^A^{ttack delay}^{: 0.55 |} ^Range^{: 4 |} ^Accuracy^{: 80% |} ^{Projectile speed}^{: 7 |} ^{Hit points}^{: 50 |} ^Armor^{: 0/1 |} ^Speed^{: 1.45 |} ^{Line of sight}^{: 8 |} ^{Attack bonuses}^{: +2 vs Spearman |} ^{Already in-game model}^{: Kotyan Khan hero unit.}

^Reasoning^{: I have always thought that a single generic Cavalry Archer unit doesn't reflect the variety and scope of medieval horse archery across the old world. Introducing a "light" version of Cavalry Archers for the civs more famed for their horse archery (the peoples of the steppes} would diversify the game, creating a divide between the more "heavy cav" cavalry archers to the "light cav" horse archers. Also, they would fulfill a new niche, being available since the Feudal Age, thus avoiding the awkward transition to Cavalry archers that's in the game now, and further encouraging the Huns, Mongols, Cumans and Tatars to go for cav archers as soon as agression begins.)

Ghulam line: Fast horsemen with high pierce armor and attack bonuses vs archers for islamic civs (Berbers, Malians, Saracens and Turks), available from the Castle Age onwards. These civs lose access to the Knight line.

Processing img 590j04ctadj71...

Ghulam

^Cost^{: 40F, 55G |} ^{Training time}^{: 24 seconds |} ^Attack^{: 8 |} ^{Rate of fire}^{: 1.9 |} ^{Frame delay}^{: - |} ^A^{ttack delay}^{: - |} ^Range^{: - |} ^Accuracy^{: - |} ^{Projectile speed}^{: - |} ^{Hit points}^{: 90 |} ^Armor^{: 0/2 |} ^Speed^{: 1.5 |} ^{Line of sight}^{: 6 |} ^{Attack bonuses}^{: +5 vs Archer, +3 vs Cavalry Archer}

Elite Ghulam

^Cost^{: 40F, 55G |} ^{Training time}^{: 20 seconds |} ^Attack^{: 10 |} ^{Rate of fire}^{: 1.85 |} ^{Frame delay}^{: - |} ^A^{ttack delay}^{: - |} ^Range^{: - |} ^Accuracy^{: - |} ^{Projectile speed}^{: - |} ^{Hit points}^{: 120 |} ^Armor^{: 1/3 |} ^Speed^{: 1.55 |} ^{Line of sight}^{: 7 |} ^{Attack bonuses}^{: +8 vs Archer, +5 vs Cavalry Archer}

Savaran Knight line: unique persian heavy cavalry with high speed and attack but lesser armor, resistant to bonus damage. Replaces the Knight line for Persians.

Processing img mc38safdadj71...

Savaran Knight

^Cost^{: 50F, 80G |} ^{Training time}^{: 30 seconds |} ^Attack^{: 12 |} ^{Rate of fire}^{: 2.0 |} ^{Frame delay}^{: - |} ^A^{ttack delay}^{: - |} ^Range^{: - |} ^Accuracy^{: - |} ^{Projectile speed}^{: - |} ^{Hit points}^{: 100 |} ^Armor^{: 1/2 |} ^Speed^{: 1.45 |} ^{Line of sight}^{: 4 |} ^{Attack bonuses}^{: - |} ^{Armor classes}^{: Cavalry +6}

Elite Savaran Knight

^Cost^{: 50F, 80G |} ^{Training time}^{: 30 seconds |} ^Attack^{: 16 |} ^{Rate of fire}^{: 1.9 |} ^{Frame delay}^{: - |} ^A^{ttack delay}^{: - |} ^Range^{: - |} ^Accuracy^{: - |} ^{Projectile speed}^{: - |} ^{Hit points}^{: 140 |} ^Armor^{: 2/3 |} ^Speed^{: 1.45 |} ^{Line of sight}^{: 5 |} ^{Attack bonuses}^{: - |} ^{Armor classes}^{: Cavalry +9}

CIVILIZATION BALANCE

Berbers

ARCHITECTURE

Change their architecture set from Middle Eastern ▶ African.

UNITS

Gain access to the Ghulam line.
Lose access to the Knight line.

TECHNOLOGIES

Maghrebi Camels: ~~Camel units regenerate HP~~ ▶ Camel units regenerate HP, Camel Riders deal +25% bonus damage.

^Reasoning: ^{A move away from the overwhelmingly common all in knight rush, Ghilmen are weaker in melee, but even better at raiding, so Berbers would now need to mix camels and maybe some siege before destroying their enemies in early Castle Age. A buff to their Camels goes in the same direction.}

Burmese

CIVILIZATION

Onager upgrade free.

^Reasoning: ^{Just some help against strong archer civs, their clear nemesis. If it proves too strong, maybe free Siege Engineers would fit better.}

Britons

TECHNOLOGIES

Yeomen: ~~Foot archers +1 range, Towers +2 attack~~ ▶ Foot archers +1 range and +1P armor, Longbowmen can be trained at Archery Ranges.
Lose access to the Ring Archer Armor technology.

^Reasoning: ^{I think Britons are a perfect civ in regards to gameplay balance... But come on, Longbowmen where the backbone of their army and the icon of medieval England. These changes would bring Longbows from a beloved unit that you only see in Arena or in some team games to a staple of every Briton army... just as in real life. And I think given their tremendous advantage in range, losing Ring Archer Armor makes them vulnerable to a little more than just rams (which is almost the case by now}. In my opinion, these changes would strengthen the Briton identity even more, as well as slightly nerf them in the "archer civ" pecking order, as they would still be one of the best, but not by as wide a margin as now (don't forget... Yeomen is really expensive, especially for the Castle Age!).)

Burgundians

TECHNOLOGIES

~~Flemish revolution~~: replaced by the Jupons technology.
Jupons: Knights and Coustilliers +2P armor.

^Reasoning^: ^{Flemish revolution... I know, they're not gonna change it. Just wanted to include this for those of us who really dislike these elements of "instant" things in our game... And this is coming from someone who has won several games by this tech alone when I should've lost. But it feels wrong.}

Celts

TECHNOLOGIES

~~Stronghold~~: replaced by the Claymore technology.
Claymore: Two-handed Swordsmen +1 range. Enables Gallowglass at Castles (heavy swordsman resistant to bonus damage).

Gallowglass

^Cost^{: 70F, 45G |} ^{Training time}^{: 8 seconds |} ^Attack^{: 20 |} ^{Rate of fire}^{: 3.35 |} ^{Frame delay}^{: - |} ^A^{ttack delay}^{: - |} ^Range^{: 1 |} ^Accuracy^{: - |} ^{Projectile speed}^{: - |} ^{Hit points}^{: 95 |} ^Armor^{: 4/1 |} ^Speed^{: 0.95 |} ^{Line of sight}^{: 4 |} ^{Attack bonuses}^{: - |} ^{Armor classes}^{: +10 Infantry |} ^{Already in-game model}^{: William Wallace hero unit.}

UNITS

Lose access to the Champion upgrade.

^Reasoning: ^{Has anybody ever researched Stronghold? Look,} ^{I know that there's nothing really wrong with Celts, a beloved and iconic civ for the game. This is why I don't see this change as a necessity, but more of a a luxury for those of us that appreciate a little more historic realism... In addition to the great siege, this would represent the real historic celtic warriors with an iconic weapon, the Claymore, and a caste of proud and armored warriors, the Gallowglasses.}

Lose access to the Paladin regional unit.

Cumans

CIVILIZATION

Steppe Lancers cost -10% in Castle, -20% in Imperial Age.

TECHNOLOGIES

Steppe Husbandry: ~~Light Cavalry, Cavalry Archers, Steppe Lancers trained 100% faster~~ ▶ Steppe Lancers attack 33% faster.
Steppe Husbandry: cost increased from 200F, 300W ▶ 550F, 450W.

UNITS

Gain access to the Mounted Archer line.
Lose access to the Knight line.

^Reasoning: ^{The civ icon says it all... Cumans shouldn't be a Paladin civ, in my opinion, but a Steppe Lancer one. Cheaper, faster attacking Steppe Lancers (along with the cheaper Stables} should contribute to expand the Cuman identity beyond the "weird civ with the 2 feudal TCs which kills or gets killed. Hard". It's really hard to balance this civ while conserving that 2 TCs identity (I really like that identity, just hard to balance it).)

Huns

CIVILIZATION

~~Cavalry Archers cost -10% Castle, -20% Imperial Age~~ ▶ Mounted Archers and Cavalry Archers cost -10% Feudal, -20% Castle, -30% Imperial Age.
Steppe Lancers +1/+1 armor in Castle and Imperial Age.

TECHNOLOGIES

~~Marauders~~: replaced by the Wagon Trains technology.
~~Atheism~~: replaced by the Scourge of God technology.
Wagon Trains: create Tarkans at Stables, land units move at the speed of the fastest unit in the formation.
Scourge of God: enemy relics generate -50% gold, mounted units +5 attack vs civilian units.

UNITS

Gain access to the Mounted Archer line.
Gain access to the Steppe Lancer line.
Lose access to the Knight line.

^Reasoning: ^{Ok, quite some changes for the most played civ of all time. But I believe they add to their identity instead of changing it. Steppe Lancers will be a tough cavalry unit, not as pop efficient as their current Paladins but much, much cheaper, and more alternatives for their mounted archery lineup adds another layer of strategic depth to the civ, at least in my opinion.}

Incas

CIVILIZATION

~~Villagers affected by Blacksmith upgrades starting in Castle Age~~ ▶ Villagers affected by Blacksmith upgrades starting in Castle Age, repair 30% faster.
~~Houses support 10 population~~ ▶ Houses support 10 population, +50% HP.
~~Buildings cost -15% stone~~ ▶ Buildings cost -20% stone.
Units receive don't receive additional damage from elevation bonuses.
Masonry, Architecture free.
Team bonus: ~~Farms built 100% faster~~ ▶ Repairing buildings costs -50%.

TECHNOLOGIES

~~Andean Sling~~: replaced by the Qhapaq Ñan technology.
Qhapaq Ñan: all land units move 10% faster.

^Reasoning: ^{I love Incas, but lets face it... They are the "dull eagle civ". They used to have a distict identity, what with the vill rush and all, but now, nothing. They feel really, really generic. So one solution could be doubling down on their great achievements in real life: giant Fortresses, brilliant architecture, mountain warfare and a great road system that spanned almost half of the Andes (the Qhapaq Ñan}.)

Indians

CIVILIZATION

~~Stable units +1P armor in Castle and Imperial Age (+2 total)~~ ▶ Stable units +1P armor in Imperial Age
~~Fishermen work 10% faster~~ ▶ All gold income is 10% faster.
Elephant units attack 18% faster.
Team bonus: ~~Camel units +4 attack vs buildings~~ ▶ Elephant units +2 line of sight

TECHNOLOGIES

~~Sultans~~: replaced with the Warrior Dynasties technology
~~Shatagni~~: replaced with the Gajashaalas technology.
Warrior Dynasties: land military units (except siege weapons) cost -10%.
Gajashaalas: Elephant Archers can be trained at Archery Ranges, Elephant units trained 33% faster.

UNITS

Gain access to Knights.
Gain access to Battle Elephants and Elite Battle Elephants.

^Reasoning: ^{Indians whitout Elephants... Crazy, right? Indians has long been the most broken AoE2 civs in terms of identity and coherence. Yes, its almost a civ rewrite, but I think it does them justice, especially when I believe in the future we're probably get an expansion centered around India itself. If and when it arrives, this version of India is meant to represent the} ^Rajputs ^{(with a lot of other indian civs as possibilities, as the Delhians, Tamils, Bengalis, etc.}. This civ should be an Elephant Civ, and you could now actually pair up Battle Elephants and Elephant Archers, but lacking Plate Barding Armor.)

Italians

TECHNOLOGIES

Pavise: ~~Foot archers and Condottieri +1/+1 armor~~ ▶ Foot archers, Condottieri, Hand Cannoneers +2/+1 armor.

^Reasoning: ^{A small buff for Italians on land maps.}

Koreans

CIVILIZATION

Team bonus: ~~Mangonel-line minimum range reduced~~ ▶ Unique technologies cost -20%.

^Reasoning: ^{I fail to see when that team bonus is useful... And especially considering that its a team bonus, and team games rarely present the situation for this extremely situational bonus to be effective (except in really closed maps, I guess}. Anyway, Shinkichon is very rare as well, what with koreans being an archer civ now. The new bonus would be more unique, while also representing the great intellectual pursuits that korean kings patronaged during the Middle Ages.)

Malians

UNITS

Gain access to the Ghulam line.
Lose access to the Knight line.

^Reasoning: ^{Flavor change, and also Malians are more an Infantry than a Cavalry civ anyway.}

Magyars

CIVILIZATION

Archery Range technologies cost -50%.
Team bonus: ~~Foot archers +2 LOS~~ ▶ Herdables +2 line of sight, move 33% faster.

TECHNOLOGIES

~~Corvinian Army~~: replaced by the Apostolic Kingdom technology.
Apostolic Kingdom: gain a free relic and access to the Knight line, but lose access to the Mounted Archer line.

UNITS

Gain access to the Mounted Archer line.
Magyar Huszar and Elite Magyar Huszar: cost changed from 80F, 10G ▶ 90F.

^Reasoning: ^{Magyars are almost a great civ, in theory, only lacking a real eco bonus. I know that giving them a solid early eco bonus would probably make them overpowered, so instead maybe a buff to early scouting and overall Dark Age quality of life, as well as easier transition to or from ranged to melee units, rounds them up as a very unique civilization: a nomadic, raider people that invaded Europe, and their later face, that of the Kingdom of Hungary (thus, the unique tech giving you the option to remain tied to the steppes, this influenced by the awesome Honfoglalás scenario}.)

Mongols

CIVILIZATION

~~Cavalry Archers fire 25% faster~~ ▶ Cavalry Archers and Mounted Archers fire 25% faster.

TECHNOLOGIES

Nomads: replaced by the Kharash technology.
Kharash: Pikemen cost -15 food and wood, trained 100% faster.
Lose access to the Plate Mail Armor technology.

UNITS

Gain access to the Mounted Archer line.
Lose access to the Knight line.

^Reasoning: ^{Nobody ever took advantage of Nomads. Instead, the hordes used to utilize recruits from conquered regions as shock forces to protect their mobile cavalry and cavalry archers, and called them Kharash. Also, Fully upgraded Champions is something that Mongols don't need and shouldn't have (yes, Champions without Plate Mail steal handle Eagles well enough}.)

Persians

ARCHITECTURE

Change their architecture set from Middle eastern ▶ Central Asian.

TECHNOLOGIES

~~Mahouts~~: replaced with the Mard o Mard technology.
Mard o Mard: Savaran Knights +6 attack vs unique units.

UNITS

Elite War Elephant: moves 30% faster.
Gain access to Savaran Knights, which replace the Knight line.

^Reasoning: ^{I think that the devs, when designing the Persian civ, were mostly focused on the Sassanian Empire of late antiquity (despite the bombard cannons and hand cannoneers}. As future expansions could add new central asian, persianate civs like the Ghaznavids, Ghurids, Samanids, etc (yes, AI names include their leaders representing the persian civ, but anyway), I think our good old persians should more closely resemble that great empire. Thus, their iconic Savaran knights, a counterparts to their rival byzantine cataphracts. I think this change opens up the arrival of new civs in Central Asia, distinguishing the Sassanian persians from the later centuries Persianate cultures.)

Saracens

CIVILIZATION

~~Market trade cost only 5%, Markets cost -100 wood~~ ▶ Bazaar replaces Market* (Cost: 100W | Traits: Trade cost is only 5%, generates 5% of the gold that other player's Trade Carts generate with each trip).
Technologies cost -20% gold.
Bloodlines free.
Team bonus: ~~Foot archers +2 attack vs buildings~~ ▶ Caravan free.

^\) ^Cost^{: 100W |} ^Traits^{: Work rate +25%. trade cost is only 5%, grants 5% of the gold that other player's Trade Carts generate with each trip.}

TECHNOLOGIES

~~Madrasah~~: replaced by the Iqta technology.
Iqta: Mamelukes cost -15 gold.
Zealotry: ~~Camel units +20 hit points~~ ▶ Camel units +20 hit points, Camel Riders attack 33% faster.

UNITS

Gain access to the Ghulam line.
Lose access to the Knight line.

^Reasoning: ^{Saracens are in practice a bit too much on the archer side, and if the Indians become an Elephant civ, they should take their place as the top camel civ. To further this point, Mamelukes are great, but just too much expensive, and Madrasah isn't really a useful tech unless un Arena smushes. Free Bloodlines reflects the universal fame and praise received by arabian horses, and incentivizes cavalry play, be it with Camel Riders or with Ghilmen. Finally, the center of science, culture and development during most of the middle ages should get a bonus toward technology, and a focus on gold discounts could make mamelukes even more viable.}

Sicilians

TECHNOLOGIES

Hauberk: ~~Knights +1/+2 armor~~ ▶ Barracks units and Serjeants +1/+2 armor

^Reasoning: ^{I don't undestand this recent change for Sicilians. Aren't they supposed to be an infantry civ? Now their cavaliers are the best in the game, being really hard to counter by almost anything cost effective. Anyway... Changing the armor bonus from knights to infantry makes Sicilian (or Norman, as they should've been named} Champs and Halbs be an intermediate point between the melee toughness of Teutons and the heavy pierce armor Malians. Makes their infantry even more flexible and encourages Serjeant play even more, giving the civ more of a clear identity.)

Slavs

TECHNOLOGIES

Orthodoxy: ~~Monks +3/+3 armor~~ ▶ Monks +2/+2 armor, move 10% faster. Additional +1/+1 armor and +5% speed for each garrisoned relic (maximum 4 relics).

^Reasoning: ^{I think Orthodoxy is borderline useless, as units with so few HP as Monks don't get as much a benefit from armor. This change would highten the armor, add the possibility of relic play and really faster monks would make the tech more attractive.}

Spanish

TECHNOLOGIES

~~Inquisition~~: replaced by the Reconquista technology.
Reconquista (600F, 250S): upgrades Castles to Alcázars*

^\) ^Cost^{: 650S |} ^Traits^{: +25% HP (6000}, +10 garrison capacity, fire 50% faster.)
Supremacy: ~~Villagers stronger in combat~~ ▶ Villagers stronger in combat. Halberdiers and Hand Cannoneers are immune to bonus damage.

^Reasoning: ^{Currently Spanish are too geared towards the latest stages of their medieval history, what with the conquerors expansion theme and the spaniard exploits in the Americas being highlighted. But arguably the most important period for this civ, and the most representative, is that of the famous Reconquista. It could be represented by an iconic unit from the time, the famous Almogávars (anti-cavalry skirms, for instance}, but the Spanish already have 2 unique units, so buffing their Castles both strengthens their Conquistador play and gives more flavor to the civ. Also, Spanish dominion in Europe in the 16th century is represented by Supremacy, but I think that a minor tweak could make a nod to the allpowerful spanish Tercios that would dominate (and thus gain Supremacy) european battlefields for the better part of a century.)

Tatars

UNITS

Gain access to the Mounted Archer line.
Lose access to the Knight line.
Flaming Camel: reduced cost from 75F, 30G ▶ 65F, 20G

^Reasoning: ^{No point in having Cavaliers when Keshiks are available. Just... they're a cav archer and light cav civ.}

Turks

TECHNOLOGIES

Sipahi: ~~Cavalry Archers +20 HP~~ ▶ Cavalry Archers, Ghilmen +20 HP.

UNITS

Gain access to the Ghulam line.
Lose access to the Knight line.

^Reasoning: ^{Similar to the Tatars, only that Turks have their great gunpowder going for them. Cavalier is not needed and not historical, but beefier Ghilmen would replace that just fine, especially since they would be even better at raiding (something that they're already very good at with their extra pierce armor Hussars}.)

Vietnamese

TECHNOLOGIES

~~Enemy positions are revealed at the start of the game~~ ▶ Imperial Skirmisher upgrade available in the Imperial Age.
Elite Skirmisher upgrade free.
Team bonus: ~~Imperial Skirmisher upgrade available in the Imperial Age~~ ▶ Enemy positions are revealed at the start of the game.

TECHNOLOGIES

~~Paper money~~: replaced by the Guerrilla Warfare technology.
Guerrilla Warfare: Foot archers and Skirmishers move 10% faster.

^Reasoning: ^{I think skirms are mostly a 1v1 thing, and that knowing enemy positions at the start just screams "team bonus". Also, making their crossbows and skirms more adept at hitting and running, avoiding unwanted battles, just suits thematically with the civs identity.}

IDEAS FOR FURTHER EXPANSIONS

1 » The Mountain Kings

As expansions appear to be shifting from the westernmost regions of the Old World and heading towards the East, the next logical area to explore and expand after Nort-eastern Europe is the Causasus region, a brucible between 4 worlds: eastern slavic Europe, the Byzantine Empire, the northern steppes and the Persian (and later Arabic) south. Thus, "The Mountain Kings", centered around the Caucasus region, adding 2 new civs, 3 new campaigns (one for each new civ, and one for the Byzantines*) and a new architecture set.

^\) ^{By the way, I can't even begin to comprehend how arguably the most storied civ in the game has a fictional campaign set in another land, and in which the protagonists don't even identify themselves as byzantines... If you ask me, make this campaign about Belisarius, who has a really heroic story and interacted with innumerable civs across the Middle East and the Mediterranean, almost restoring the full glory of ancient Rome by himself.}

GENERAL

Adds the Eastern Mediterranean architecture set to the game, shared by civs greatly influenced by byzantine greek culture: Armenians, Bulgarians, Byzantines and Georgians.
Rename the Mediterranean architecture set to Western Mediterranean, which more accurately reflects the civs that share it now: Italians, Portuguese, Sicilians (which should be Normans, by the way xD) and Spanish.

BUILDINGS

Palisade wall: hit points decreased from 150 ▶ 130 in the Dark Age and from 250 ▶ 220 in the Feudal Age. Also decrease their armor from 2/5 ▶ 1/5.
Palisade gate: hit points decreased from 240 ▶ 210 in the Dark Age and from 400 ▶ 350 in the Feudal Age. Also decrease their armor from 2/2 ▶ 1/2.

TECHNOLOGIES

Town Watch: Building LOS +4 ▶ Building LOS +4, Palisade walls and Palisade Gates +20% HP, +1/+1 armor.
Town Patrol: Building LOS +4 ▶ Building LOS +4, Palisade walls and Palisade Gates +20% HP, +1/+1 armor.

^Reasoning: ^{Nerf walling actively this time, but without making it prohibitive: instead, becoming a heavier strategic decision. Needing Town Watch to strengthen palisades (especially against ranged units} to a level slightly above the strength that they have now, you lose TC time and 75 food. And Arabia can get back to being a reasonable map :))

NEW CIVS

https://preview.redd.it/cvp0qeof15k71.jpg?width=3333&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=aba4fcc53313411735e35b33d654163714fb389b

2 » Shields of the Faith

Continuing the journey East (sort of) I think the game should shine a little more light on one of the most iconic medieval conflicts there is: the Crusades. The idea would be to introduce and present civs to expand the roster of islamic civs, kind of lessening the umbrella character which Saracens now have (yes, Franks and Burgundians, all right, but clump all arabian kingdoms and dynasties in a single civ in the same game? I think this shouldn't be). And this time, instead of focusing on a particular area of the map, I thought the expansion could be centered upon a concept: the peoples who defended their lands against the crusaders in the East (thus, the Seljuks*) and in the uttermost West (enter the Moors).

^\) ^{Also, Seljuks could differenciate Turks (who are also a huge umbrella civ} a little more: Seljuks for the early turkic peoples who were persianized and adopted Islam, and Turks for the Sultanate of Rum and the later Ottoman Empire (the gunpowder aspect makes it clear).)

GENERAL

Turks: Renamed Ottomans.

NEW CIVS

https://preview.redd.it/3dm8anov15k71.jpg?width=3333&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e073b9e38482d9aeff359d050f92c37fa9014288

3 » Sultans of the East

Bridging the iranian plateau and north-western India, this expansion could focus on the late Persianate cultures and the muslim conquests in India, beginning to differenciate umbrella civs like Persians and, of course, the current Indians. So, in addition to adding Ghurids and Delhians to the game, you could also include a proper campaign for Sassanid Persia, unexplored until now.

CIVILIZATIONS

Indians: renamed to Rajputs. Changed their wonder to Chittorgarh Fort. Changed their unique unit from Elephant Archer ▶ Purbiya (camel hand cannoneer with attack bonus vs other cavalry).

Processing img nhpeyhwdvcj71...

^Cost^{: 35F, 75G |} ^{Training time}^{: 10 seconds |} ^Attack^{: 14 ▶ 18 |} ^{Rate of fire}^{: 3.2 |} ^{Frame delay}^{: 13 |} ^A^{ttack delay}^{: 42 |} ^Range^{: 6 |} ^Accuracy^{: 70% ▶ 80% |} ^{Projectile speed}^{: 7 |} ^{Hit points}^{: 50 ▶ 65 |} ^Armor^{: 1/1 ▶ 2/1 |} ^Speed^{: 1.35 |} ^{Line of sight}^{: 7 |} ^{Attack bonuses}^{: +8 vs War Elephant, +6 vs Cavalry, +4 vs Camel ▶ +12 vs War Elephant, +9 vs Cavalry, +6 vs Camel}

TECHNOLOGIES

Gajashaalas: ~~Elephant archers can be trained at Archery Ranges, Battle Elephants trained 33% faster~~ ▶ Stables x2 HP, Battle Elephants trained 33% faster.

UNITS

Imperial Camel Rider: removed from the game.
Elephant Archer and Elite Elephant Archer: Removed as the unique unit of the Indians, and instead becomes a regional unit for all southern asian civs: Bengalis, Burmese, Delhians, Khmer, Malay, Rajputs, and Tamils.

NEW CIVS

https://preview.redd.it/8z25il1225k71.jpg?width=3333&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2518b167951f484f9c4f0b5c9e4f50b9dab87cf0

4 » The Indian Princes

Continuing on east, two more civs could round up the Indian subcontinent: Tamils (representing mainly the Chola Empire) and Bengalis (Pala Empire). Thus the game would have the original Indian civ (renamed Rajputs) representing Rajasthan, the Ghurids and Delhians representing the muslim conquerors that reshapred northern India in the Middle ages, and then the Tamils for South India and the Bengalis for the eastern gangetic plain, establishing a territorial link with the westernmost of the Southeast asian civs, the Burmese.

NEW CIVS

https://preview.redd.it/0ijrl8hj25k71.jpg?width=3333&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=56c136c1d6afa0eb941be3df0ba63bf27c6c6ca4

5 » Ascent of the Emperors

Rounding up the Aoe2 lineup, we arrive at the far east of Asia introducing two empires on the borders of China: the Tibetan Empire and the Jurchens (the ancestors of the Manchu people, founders of the Jin empire). In addition to completing the roster of eastern asian empires, this expansion could include campaigns for the most neglected area of the world in terms of AoE2 campaigns: the Chinese (especially), Koreans and Japanese.

GENERAL

New herdable animal: Yak.

^\) ^Cost^{: 30 wood (Tibetans only} |) ^{Training time}^{: 20 seconds |} ^{Maximum food}^{: 100 |} ^{Rate of fire}^{: 2.0 |} ^{Line of sight}^{: 3}

NEW CIVS

https://preview.redd.it/if9qkov335k71.jpg?width=3333&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=11ddcbb6dd07fa48d0db3fe2d98f4ff2223968cd

One last civ to round up our game...

At this point, we would be at 49 civs, and you know we can't stop at 49 :D

There's one more area of the World that is quite unexplored (even though a campaign is set there, but it is a very, VERY monotonous campaign in terms of civs): Andean South America. It stands to reason that a new andean civ should be added, by several reasons. First, we need to reach 50 civs, and not 49. Second, most architecture sets apply to at least 4 civs, and the native american one applies to 3 at the moment. And third, there are 2 mesoamerican civs, and 1 andean civ, lonely and isolated. Just get their rivals in the game: the Chimú. (Oh, and fourth, another eagle civ would be great for the competitive scene, especially with civ drafts being so crucial nowadays).

^{I don't know how to include this civ in any kind of themed expansions, I'm eager to know if you have any ideas about it! :})

CHANGES TO INCLUDE WITH THE CHIMÚ CIVILIZATION

Slingers: they are no longer a unique unit for Incas, but a regional units shared by Incas and Chimú. Also, base slingers are weaker, but available in the Feudal Age, and the stats for the current Slingers go for the new Elite Slinger (available in the Castle Age, making it akin to the Elite Skirmisher, anti-infantry instead of anti-archer).

Processing img tt2q7jg6uqj71...

The Chimú are an infantry and monk civilization.

CIV BONUSES

Town Center technologies are researched at Mills (Loom, Wheelbarrow, Hand Cart) and Barracks (Town Watch, Town Patrol).
Slingers, Eagle Warriors cost -10% Feudal, -20% Castle, -30% Imperial Age.
Gillnets, Squires free.
Team Bonus: Infantry units +2 LOS.
Architecture set: Native American.
Wonder: Chan Chan Citadel.
Speech: Mochica.

UNIQUE TECHNOLOGIES

Mallqis: Monks and Monastery technologies cost -15% per relic garrisoned (maximum 5 relics).
Spear-maces: Spearmen, Eagle Warriors ignore enemy armor.

UNIQUE UNIT

Mochica Warrior: mace wielding heavy infantry that reduces enemy unit's speed with each attack*.

^(\ Each attack lowers the attacked unit's speed by 0.1 (the lowest speed enemy units can get is 50% of their current speed. Fully healed units regain their speed.)*

^Cost^{: 60F, 50G |} ^{Training time}^{: 18 seconds |} ^Attack^{: 10 ▶ 14 |} ^{Rate of fire}^{: 2.0 |} ^{Frame delay}^{: - |} ^{Attack delay}^{: - |} ^Range^{: - |} ^Accuracy^{: - |} ^{Projectile speed}^{: - |} ^{Hit points}^{: 75 ▶ 90 |} ^Armor^{: 1/1 ▶ 2/1 |} ^Speed^{: 1.1 |} ^{Line of sight}^{: 6 |} ^{Attack bonuses}^{: -}

TECH TREE

Archery Range

^{Archer line}^{: Archer ▶} ~~^Crossbowman~~ ^▶ ~~^Arbalester~~ ^| ^{Skirmisher line}^{: Skirmisher ▶ Elite Skirmisher |} ~~^{Cavalry archer line}~~^: ~~^{Cavalry Archer}~~ ^▶ ~~^{Heavy Cavalry Archer}~~ ^| ~~^{Horse archer line}~~~~^{: Mounted Archer}~~ ^▶ ~~^{Horse Archer}~~ ^▶ ~~^{Elite Horse Archer}~~ ^| ~~^Gunpowder~~^: ~~^{Hand Cannoneer}~~ ^| ~~^{Elephant archer line}~~^: ~~^{Elephant Archer}~~ ^▶ ~~^{Elite Elephant Archer}~~ ^| ^{Slinger line}^{: Slinger ▶ Elite Slinger |} ^Technologies^{: Thumb Ring -} ~~^{Parthian Tactics}~~

Barracks

^{Militia line}^{: Militia ▶ Man-at-arms ▶ Long Swordsman ▶ Two-handed Swordsman ▶ Champion |} ^{Spearman line}^{: Spearman ▶ Pikeman ▶ Halberdier |} ^{Eagle warrior line}^{: Eagle Scout ▶ Eagle Warrior ▶ Elite Eagle Warrior |} ^Technologies^{: Supplies - Squires - Arson - Town Watch - Town Patrol}

~~Stable~~

~~^{Scout cavalry line}~~^: ~~^{Scout Cavalry}~~ ^▶ ~~^{Light Cavalry}~~ ^▶ ~~^Hussar~~ ^| ~~^{Knight line}~~^: ~~^Knight~~ ^▶ ~~^Cavalier~~ ^▶ ~~^Paladin~~ ^| ~~^{Camel rider line}~~^: ~~^{Camel Rider}~~ ^▶ ~~^{Heavy Camel Rider}~~ ^| ~~^{Battle elephant line}~~^: ~~^{Battle Elephant}~~ ^▶ ~~^{Elite Battle Elephant}~~ ^| ~~^{Steppe lancer line}~~^: ~~^{Steppe Lancer}~~ ^▶ ~~^{Elite Steppe Lancer}~~ ^| ~~^{Ghulam line}~~^: ~~^Ghulam~~ ^▶ ~~^{Elite Ghulam}~~ ^| ~~^Technologies~~^: ~~^Bloodlines~~ ^- ~~^Husbandry~~

Siege Workshop

^{Ram line}^{: Battering Ram ▶ Capped Ram ▶} ~~^{Siege Ram}~~ ^| ^{Mangonel line}^{: Mangonel ▶ Onager ▶} ~~^{Siege Onager}~~ ^| ^{Scorpion line}^{: Scorpion ▶} ~~^{Heavy Scorpion}~~ ^| ^{Siege tower line}^{: Siege Tower |} ~~^Gunpowder~~^: ~~^{Bombard Cannon}~~

Blacksmith

^{Archer armor}^{: Padded Archer Armor ▶ Leather Archer Armor ▶} ~~^{Ring Archer Armor}~~ ^| ^{Ranged attack}^{: Fletching ▶ Bodkin Arrow ▶} ^{Bracer |} ^{Melee attack}^{: Forging ▶} ~~^{Iron Casting}~~ ^▶ ~~^{Blast Furnace}~~ ^| ~~^{Cavalry armor}~~^: ~~^{Scale Barding Armor}~~ ^▶ ~~^{Chain Barding Armor}~~ ^▶ ~~^{Plate Barding Armor}~~ ^| ^{Infantry armor}^{: Scale Mail Armor ▶ Chain Mail Armor ▶} ~~^{Plate Mail Armor}~~

Dock

^{Fire ship line}^{: Fire Galley ▶ Fire Ship ▶} ^{Fast Fire Ship |} ^{Demolition ship line}^{: Demolition Raft ▶ Demolition Ship ▶ Heavy Demolition Ship |} ^{Galley line}^{: Galley ▶ War Galley ▶ Galleon |} ~~^{Cannon galleon line}~~^: ~~^{Cannon Galleon}~~ ^▶ ~~^{Elite Cannon Galleon}~~ ^| ^Technologies^{: Careening ▶ Dry Dock - Shipwright}

University

^Technologies^{: Masonry ▶} ~~^Architecture~~ ^- ~~^{Fortified Wall}~~ ^{- Chemistry ▶} ~~^{Bombard Tower}~~ ^{- Ballistics -} ~~^{Guard Tower}~~ ^▶ ~~^Keep~~ ^- ~~^{Heated Shot}~~ ^{- Murder Holes -} ~~^{Treadmill Crane}~~ ^{- Siege Engineers -} ~~^Arrowslits~~

Castle

^Technologies^: ~~^Hoardings~~ ^{- Sappers}

Monastery

^Technologies^{: Redemption - Atonement - Herbal Medicine - Heresy - Sanctity - Fervor - Faith - Illumination - Block Printing - Theocracy}

Eco techs

^{Mining camp}^{: Gold mining ▶ Gold Shaft Mining - Stone mining ▶} ~~^{Stone Shaft Mining}~~ ^| ^{Mining camp}^{: Double-bit Axe ▶ Bow Saw ▶ Two-man Saw |} ^Market^{: Coinage ▶ Banking - Cavaran - Guilds |} ^Mill^{: Horse Collar ▶ Heavy Plough ▶} ^{Crop Rotation}

After all this many, many changes (hey, dreaming is free, right?) I believe we would have a game even more diverse and awesome than we already have, with a little touch of cultural diversity and a little bit less generic feel (xbows/knights most of the time). This was made with a lot of love for this wonderful game, which i've been playing on an off for 23 years now. I'm really looking forward to your feedback on this, as a big part of why I post this is to share with you so we can imagine together in what direction this wonderful game will go in the future. If you came this far, thanks for your commitment, age fans are the best! :)

submitted by /u/Alastan
[link] [comments]

Is last DLC worth it ?

Posted: 29 Aug 2021 02:28 AM PDT

I was disappointed by the previous one and I don't play multiplayer. Thanks for your answers.

View Poll

submitted by /u/Ptit_Swicks
[link] [comments]

Queue dodging isn't an issue... The bad matchmaking code is !

Posted: 28 Aug 2021 03:50 PM PDT

I don't understand why there are so many threads complaining about people que skipping / dodging; well I do understand but I can't help but think they completely miss the point.

Queue dodging itself isn't an issue at all, the issue is that the match making code is so broken that 1 person leaving causes the whole lobby to be cancelled! Could you imagine a trying to have a game of call of duty where if one person leaves the whole lobby is abandoned... you'd never start a single match.

What we really should be complaining about, and also demanding for, is for them to fix the match making code so that lobbies are held open until all slots have been filled and the game is started, that is that they don't ditch the lobby as soon as one person DC's !!

submitted by /u/coolio9876
[link] [comments]

Noob question: control castle attack

Posted: 29 Aug 2021 02:17 AM PDT

Hey guys,

I can't figure out how i can tell my castle to attack a certain building when it is in range.

For example: In one of my last games i built a castle right into my enemys face. He evacuated his remaining villagers of his wood line so the only things in range of my castle were some houses and an siege workshop. How do i tell my castle to stop attacking the houses and attack the siege workshop instead?

Right clicking Just sets the gather point onto the siege workshop.

Thank you!

submitted by /u/KumaTinTanaki
[link] [comments]

hi, as poland you can give light cav in imperial a bonus with aoe damage, does this count for wing hussars as well? thanks!

Posted: 29 Aug 2021 04:35 AM PDT

submitted by /u/FckMeImFamous
[link] [comments]

I really hate resource control maps.

Posted: 29 Aug 2021 02:43 AM PDT

So, I know that resource/map control is a large part of this game, but I absolutely despise those maps that completely revolve around it. I am talking mostly about center control maps and hybrid/water maps.

These maps include Golden Pit, Golden Swamp, Gold Rush, Atacama, Four Lakes, Islands, Nomad, Steppe, Mediterranean, Baltic, Frozen Lake and maybe others too. Most of the time there are so many of these maps in the pool that I can't ban them all unless I allow some other truly awful map. Some might say that Arena is a also one of these maps, but I disagree. On Arena, you can choose to neglect the center until imperial age. (Not that I usually do) You have enough resources so that you don't have to control the center in late castle age. Also, it is possible for both players to hold control over parts of the center, unlike with most of these maps. In other center control maps, if you don't have map control at that point, the game is over.

Why I don't like these maps? They all have a very one sided meta game with only a few viable civs and strategies. I like to go random civ for variety, but these maps usually make it really hard. The game often gets decided really early on by one fight or a series of fights. This is especially bad on hybrid maps. You lose the water, you lose the game. And water is the most boring part of the game anyways. I basically ban all water/hybrid maps except nomad. That one usually has to stay, even though it's all Persians. Sadly, it's almost a great map, but nothing fun is ever viable.

One reason I dislike these maps is that they don't suit my skill set at all. I have low apm and no micro skills so one all out fight relatively early into the game will always favor the opponent. If you have any idea, how a player like me could be competitive on these kind of high aggression maps, I would like to know. All my advantages go out of the window. Can't outwit the opponent, if there is only one viable strategy. Can't outmacro anyone, when in order to have eco, you need to control that one pile of resources. If both players are forced to do the same thing, it's only natural that the one with more mechanical skill wins.

I've considered dodging. What point is there to play a map you can't win on? My Elo gets carried by Arabia (Or now Runestones) and Arena, so I won't ever fall to a level in which I would start winning on these maps. I could also consider some cheese, but I don't usually enjoy that style of play nor excel in it.

If you think I have the wrong impression of any of these maps, please enlighten me.

submitted by /u/viiksitimali
[link] [comments]

What are arbalest with hussar spam civs?

Posted: 28 Aug 2021 09:16 AM PDT

My play style is pretty much archer line and adding light cav line as a distraction + taking out skirmishers/siege. What are the best civ options in you guys' opinion?

Pro's:

Fully upgraded arbalest/hussar obviously

Eco bonuses

Discount towards either units

Bombard cannon

other benefits?

submitted by /u/warbreakr
[link] [comments]

Online Community Appreciation Post

Posted: 28 Aug 2021 12:57 PM PDT

We truly have a great online community. And I mean that in the sense that it's really a good mix of all kinds of people.

I just finished a game where I happened to have a Magyar arbalest deathball walking in my opponents base and we're having a chat back and forth about the game that's happened and what he could've maybe done differently and it's all very polite and supportive (bearing in mind I'm just under 1000 ELO so hopefully not leading him astray any bad patterns). We started the game as rivals but ended as friends (well actually not, I probably won't see the guy again).

Contrast to yesterday when I'm getting taken out by Castle Age cavaliers (for the second time in a day, seems like I don't learn) and after I've been defeated by someone who looks like they tanked their ELO from 1200 get told "I have no brain" and to "uninstall the game".

It's good to have a mix of "The Best Online Community Ever" and keeping me grounded to what a large majority of online gaming communities are like.

submitted by /u/R3volv360
[link] [comments]

Mountain Nobles (next DLC Pitch - I'm only half-joking).

Posted: 28 Aug 2021 07:00 PM PDT

Swiss (Alps) (original conquerors civ contender)

Tibetans (Himalayas) (original conquerors civ contender)

Georgians/Armenians (Caucasus)

Infantry focus for all. Just saying u/CysionBE... you can't copyright ideas so feel free to take this one.

Breaking News

Age of Empires

Sunday, August 29, 2021

Age of Empires II This is fine.

Age of Empires II This is fine.

GENERAL CHANGES

CIVILIZATION BALANCE

Berbers

Burmese

Britons

Burgundians

Celts

Cumans

Huns

Incas

Indians

Italians

Koreans

Malians

Magyars

Mongols

Persians

Saracens

Sicilians

Slavs

Spanish

Tatars

Turks

Vietnamese

1 » The Mountain Kings

2 » Shields of the Faith

3 » Sultans of the East

4 » The Indian Princes

5 » Ascent of the Emperors

One last civ to round up our game...

No comments:

Post a Comment

Popular

Blog Archive